If the claimant wins at trial and the judgment is at least as advantageous as their Part 36 offer, what is the general financial consequence for the defendant?

Prepare for the CILEx Civil Practice (Level 7) Test. Enhance your study with comprehensive quizzes and multiple choice questions, each with hints and clarity. Get exam-ready!

Multiple Choice

If the claimant wins at trial and the judgment is at least as advantageous as their Part 36 offer, what is the general financial consequence for the defendant?

Explanation:
Part 36 offers act as a strong incentive to settle. If the claimant goes to trial and the judgment is at least as advantageous as the defendant’s Part 36 offer, the defendant must pay an extra amount of costs on top of the usual costs. This “additional amount” is a penalty linked to the damages won and is subject to specified thresholds or caps. So the financial consequence is not just standard costs; there are added penalties payable on the damages, up to certain limits. The other options either ignore these extra costs, imply an excessive or different outcome, or misstate caps on the defendant’s costs.

Part 36 offers act as a strong incentive to settle. If the claimant goes to trial and the judgment is at least as advantageous as the defendant’s Part 36 offer, the defendant must pay an extra amount of costs on top of the usual costs. This “additional amount” is a penalty linked to the damages won and is subject to specified thresholds or caps. So the financial consequence is not just standard costs; there are added penalties payable on the damages, up to certain limits. The other options either ignore these extra costs, imply an excessive or different outcome, or misstate caps on the defendant’s costs.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy