Which statement about multi-track disclosure is true?

• A. Directions are tailored to the range and complexity of cases
• B. Disclosure is fixed and identical for all cases
• C. The court cannot provide any other order
• D. The court can issue any other appropriate order

Answer: (A)

In multi-track disclosure, the move is to manage disclosure in a way that fits how big and complex the case is. Directors and orders about what has to be disclosed are not the same for every case; they’re shaped to match the range and complexity of the dispute. That means simple cases can have a tighter, quicker disclosure process with fewer documents and shorter deadlines, while more complex cases can require a broader search, staged disclosures, and longer timelines. This keeps the process proportionate and controls costs while still ensuring relevant material is disclosed.

The other statements don’t fit as well because disclosure isn’t fixed and identical for all cases, and the court isn’t limited to no other orders. The strength of multi-track disclosure is precisely that the court can tailor directions to the case and, if needed, issue additional appropriate case-management orders.